feat: feat: add comprehensive documentation for Neovim configuration project
Signed-off-by: juliano.barbosa <julianomb@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
57f551ebd9
commit
f8b3501df1
8 changed files with 727 additions and 0 deletions
82
memory-bank/decisionLog.md
Normal file
82
memory-bank/decisionLog.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
|
|||
# Architectural Decisions Log
|
||||
|
||||
## 2025-02-17 - Enhanced Mode State Management Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
### Context
|
||||
The current mode management system provides basic functionality for toggling between Plan and Act modes with simple state persistence. However, as the system grows, we need a more robust and feature-rich mode management system that can handle complex state management, mode-specific behaviors, and better integration with other components.
|
||||
|
||||
### Decision
|
||||
Implement an enhanced mode state management system with the following key components:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Advanced State Management**
|
||||
- Implement mode-specific settings store
|
||||
- Add context preservation between mode switches
|
||||
- Create mode initialization hooks
|
||||
- Add state validation and recovery mechanisms
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Event System**
|
||||
- Implement pre/post mode change hooks
|
||||
- Add event queueing system
|
||||
- Create mode-specific event handlers
|
||||
- Support async event processing
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Persistence Layer**
|
||||
- Enhanced state file format with versioning
|
||||
- State migration system
|
||||
- Corruption detection and recovery
|
||||
- Mode-specific context preservation
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Integration System**
|
||||
- Mode-aware plugin architecture
|
||||
- LSP integration with mode context
|
||||
- Buffer and window layout persistence
|
||||
- Mode-specific UI elements
|
||||
|
||||
### Rationale
|
||||
- Current system lacks robust state management
|
||||
- Need better integration with other components
|
||||
- Require more sophisticated event handling
|
||||
- Want to support mode-specific behaviors
|
||||
- Need better error handling and recovery
|
||||
- Desire for mode-specific UI/UX customization
|
||||
|
||||
### Implementation
|
||||
1. Phase 1: Core State Management
|
||||
- Enhance state persistence
|
||||
- Add validation system
|
||||
- Implement context preservation
|
||||
|
||||
2. Phase 2: Event System
|
||||
- Add event hooks
|
||||
- Implement queueing
|
||||
- Create handlers
|
||||
|
||||
3. Phase 3: Persistence Layer
|
||||
- Update state format
|
||||
- Add versioning
|
||||
- Implement migration
|
||||
|
||||
4. Phase 4: Integration
|
||||
- Plugin integration
|
||||
- LSP integration
|
||||
- UI integration
|
||||
|
||||
### Consequences
|
||||
**Positive:**
|
||||
- More robust state management
|
||||
- Better error handling
|
||||
- Enhanced user experience
|
||||
- More flexible configuration
|
||||
- Better integration capabilities
|
||||
|
||||
**Negative:**
|
||||
- Increased complexity
|
||||
- More maintenance overhead
|
||||
- Larger codebase
|
||||
- More potential failure points
|
||||
|
||||
### Status
|
||||
- Decision approved
|
||||
- Implementation planning in progress
|
||||
- Initial architecture documented
|
||||
- Ready for code mode implementation
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue